The Contrarian Digest [Week 18]
The Contrarian Digest is my weekly pick of LinkedIn posts I couldn’t ignore. Smart ideas, bold perspectives, and conversations worth having.
No algorithms, no hype… Just real ideas worth your time.
Let’s dive in [18th Edition] ๐
1๏ธโฃ Barbie Meets Big Tech โ Luiza Jarovsky, PhD
โก๐๐ง ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐: When AI enters the toy box, whoโs actually being played? A sharp take on the real cost of techโs next frontier.
๐๏ธ๐
๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ: https://lnkd.in/eR_WQ3Av
2๏ธโฃ The Dopamine Trap of Digital Arguments โ Joan Westenberg
โก๐๐ง ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐: Online debates feel smart… until you realize itโs all just audience performance. What happens when you stop playing the game?
๐๏ธ๐
๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ: https://lnkd.in/eHwkvXNW
3๏ธโฃ The Myth of YOU โ Jamil Zaki
โก๐๐ง ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐: What if the โreal youโ never existed? And that might be the most human thing of all.
๐๏ธ๐
๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ: https://lnkd.in/eaAEfVn3
4๏ธโฃ The Art of Holding Contradictions โ ๐กNuno Reis
โก๐๐ง ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐: Creativity isnโt about balance; itโs about holding extremes. The worldโs most inventive minds have one thing in common: paradox.
๐๏ธ๐
๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ: https://lnkd.in/eitYGNKV
๐ญ๐๐ฒ ๐ญ๐๐ค๐: I feel that my latest post (The Elon Musk Test)ย my latest post builds naturally on this one: https://lnkd.in/eaUXqD-R
5๏ธโฃ The Discount That Became Equity โ Nick Lebesis
โก๐๐ง ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐: When your biggest customer threatens to walk, donโt race to the bottom. This founder made them investors. This is how creative leverage works.
๐๏ธ๐
๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ: https://lnkd.in/eJ2KiMGt
6๏ธโฃ The Most Successful Lie in History โ Shashank Sharma
โก๐๐ง ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐: We say โfineโ like itโs harmless. But what if itโs NOT? A raw take on emotional dishonesty and slow suffocation.
๐๏ธ๐
๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ: https://lnkd.in/exV9mFUB
7๏ธโฃ When Expertise Becomes Your Prison โ Anish Padinjaroote
โก๐๐ง ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐: “Mastery” feels safe. Until it become a cage. Most smart people often stay stuck, mistaking competence for completion. But true mastery demands self-destruction.
๐๏ธ๐
๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ: https://lnkd.in/e7vEJPBn
๐ญ๐๐ฒ ๐ญ๐๐ค๐: Addiction & Professional Suicide โ https://lnkd.in/eawF6Vhk
8๏ธโฃ Emotional Maintenance Guide โ Eric Arzubi, MD
โก๐๐ง ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐: Mental health isnโt about “fixing whatโs broken,” but “reclaiming whatโs been lost.” Here are 10 powerful, evidence-backed ways to find your way back to yourself.
๐๏ธ๐
๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ: https://lnkd.in/ekH-ZSY9
——-
Which of these topics resonates with you the most?
Share your thoughts in the comments!
To your success,
Gaetan Portaels
Original publication date โ June 16, 2025 (HERE)
READ THE FULL POSTS BELOW (and please, don’t forget to follow the authors)
1๏ธโฃ Barbie Meets Big Tech โ Luiza Jarovsky, PhD
๐จ BREAKING: OpenAI and Mattel announce a partnership to develop AI-powered toys.
What could go wrong? ๐ฑ
According to the official announcement:
“The agreement unites Mattelโs and OpenAIโs respective expertise to design, develop, and launch groundbreaking experiences for fans worldwide. By using OpenAIโs technology, Mattel will bring the magic of AI to age-appropriate play experiences with an emphasis on innovation, privacy, and safety.”
It goes back to the old saying: “just because you can doesn’t mean you should.”
– I’m sure OpenAI is capable of integrating generative AI into toys.
– I’m sure OpenAI and Mattel can develop a Barbie or any other toy with voice-enabled ChatGPT into it.
– I’m sure Mattel is eager to tell the world how “AI first” it is, and how “AI is disrupting the toymaking industry.”
However:
– Should toys be AI-powered? Do kids need it?
– Have they considered safety issues and long-term implications?
– Does AI add anything beneficial to a toy in terms of child development?
– Should kids be exposed to potential AI harm at an early age?
The answer to the questions above is probably no.
But if you read the latest edition of my newsletter (link below), you know that it doesn’t matter: as long as it’s profitable, companies will do it, regardless of the consequences.
And tech CEOs will frame it as “the age of abundance.”
2๏ธโฃ The Dopamine Trap of Digital Arguments โ Joan Westenberg

I stopped arguing on the internet. Here’s what I learned.
Before I deleted X, I could write the perfect reply. Deploy the devastating counterpoint. Drop the mic with a brilliant analogy (according to me, at least) that left opponents speechless.
I was also getting dumber by the day.
The truth about online debates:
A. The platforms are rigged against actual learning.
B. Algorithms reward conflict over clarity
C. Character limits kill nuance
D. We perform for audiences, not truth
E. Every “win” makes us more confident while understanding less
We’re not debating…we’re dopamine farming.
Think about it: When’s the last time you changed your mind because of a LinkedIn argument? When’s the last time you saw someone else genuinely shift their position after a comment thread?
Never. It just doesn’t happen.
We’re blue teaming the crap we agree with and red teaming everything else.
The internet was supposed to be a marketplace of ideas. Instead, we built a gladiatorial arena where nuance goes to die.
Every hour I spent “winning” online debates was an hour I could have spent actually learning.
Every “clever” comeback was mental energy I could have used to understand complex issues more deeply.
What I do instead:
– Read the actual booksย (not just the summaries everyone’s debating)
– Write to explore ideasย (not to win points)
– Save real conversations for coffeeย (where context actually matters)
– Treat social media as junk entertainmentย (not education)
You will never win an argument online. Ever.
The game itself is rigged.
The only winning move: Don’t play.
3๏ธโฃ The Myth of YOU โ Jamil Zaki
Science destroys the notion of a single, “authentic” self. What can we do with that knowledge?
Especially in the West, people are deeply attached to their individual identity, the “real” you that remains steady across your life. But decades of research find that circumstances, especially social ones, change everything about you.
It’s now clear that depending on who you’re with, all of these things will change, sometimes dramatically:
Who you are (personality)
How you feel (emotions)
How your mind works (cognition)
What you retain (memory)
What happens inside your body (physiology and brain)
What you believe (opinion and ideology)
The science is clear, at many levels, *authenticity is a myth.*
Where does this leave us? It may seem scary and destabilizing, but I think it’s also beautiful, demonstrating that everyone changes us and we them. In every conversation and interaction, we are deciding, together, who to be.
Two questions can make this actionable:
(1) The people you choose to have in your life is a choice about which “you” to be. So, who makes you the best version of yourself?
(2) Your spouse and friends would be different “thems” if they had chosen differently.ย They chose to be the them they are with you. What will you do with that honor?
4๏ธโฃ The Art of Holding Contradictions โ Nuno Reis

In 1996, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi wrote a less-known, yet EYE-OPENING book: “Creativity”
Between 1990 and 1995, Csikszentmihalyi interviewed 91 exceptional creative people.
Nobel Laureate physicists to Business moguls.
Despite their differences, he found ONE common pattern to all:
Their ability to HOLD CONTRADICTIONS!
Examples?
1/ Smart + Naive
Wisdom meets childishness
2/Energetic + Quiet
Energy is under their control, not controlled by the clock
3/ Play + Discipline
Playfulness without perseverance doesnโt go far (and they know it)
4/ Fantasy + Realism
Their imagination leaps into different worlds, but not lost in abstraction
5/ Introverted + Extroverted
Creative people do NOT fit in any of the 16 Myers-Briggs personality types
(There are five more contradictions left out here, but you get the idea…)
IMPORTANT NOTE:
This doesn’t mean EVERY creative person holds ALL these contradictions.
What matters is that they have this kind of ‘Paradox Mindset’.
The capacity to hold contradictions without ‘averaging’ them.
It’s NOT some midpoint between two extremes.
It’s not about being ‘wishy-washy’.
Creativity is the ability to move from one extreme to the other as the occasion requires.
—
One final insight from Csikszentmihalyi:
Creativity isnโt just an individual thing.
Itโs also about the environment.
This is GREAT NEWS!
It means this skill isn’t reserved for the ‘naturally born creative’โ
it’s something we can ALL cultivate.
โณStep one is simple:
Be aware of your own contradictions.
โณStep two is a bit harder:
Surround yourself with people who embrace contradictions.
(…and trust me, that’s the hardest part!)
That’s why we started our Rare Dots Friday Club.
Every week, a small circle of founders, creatives, and leaders meet to hold contradictions and see what EMERGES.
The last one we found?
The contradiction between what’s important + NOT useful
(…within the utilitarian economic paradigm)
5๏ธโฃ The Discount That Became Equity โ Nick Lebesis
A founder friend called me mid-panic attack.
Runway: 3 months.
Revenue: $20K/month from one strategic customer.
Then came the email that kills startups:
โAnother vendor came in cheaper. Can you match?โ
I video-called him at 11pm.
Office lights off.
Laptop glowing.
โThey want another 30% off,โ he said.
Dragged him down from $28K to $20K.
Now they wanted $14K.
โWeโre dead either way.
Take the cut, weโre done. Lose them, weโre gone in 8 weeks.โ
Thatโs when I jumped in:
โStop discounting. Give them equity.โ
He blinked.
โYou want me to give away my company?โ
โNo. I want you to give them a reason to care if you win.โ
Next morning, he offered them 2% equity (vesting over 4 years, tied to revenue milestones).
โYouโre not just a customer anymore. Youโre helping us define this market.โ
They said yes in 24 hours.
Then the shift:
Before: โWeโre evaluating other vendors.โ
After: โHow do we help you win this category?โ
Month 1: No more pricing games
Month 2: Tactical product feedback
Month 3: Warm intros to Fortune 500s
Month 6: They led his $2M round
He repeated the pattern, MUCH smaller equity each time.
Today:
โข 47 customer-shareholders
โข 0% churn
โข A product roadmap shaped by real operators
That original 2%? Now worth over $1M.
The discount they wanted? Wouldโve saved them ~$72K?
They asked for a discount.
He made them investors.
Now they can’t afford to leave.
6๏ธโฃ The Most Successful Lie in History โ Shashank Sharma
There was a time when people said what they meant.
โIโm angry.โ
โIโm scared.โ
โI feel alone even when Iโm with people.โ
But somewhere between growing up and growing quiet, we invented something else.
A word that could hide everything, hold everything, fake everything.
We invented โFine.โ
How are you?
Fine.
Howโs work?
Fine.
Howโs the marriage, the health, the sleep, the dream that died last year?
Fine.
โFineโ is the most successful lie in human history.
Itโs short. Polite. Believable.
It doesnโt make anyone uncomfortable.
It doesnโt demand space.
It doesnโt need follow-up.
And weโve become artists at using it.
We say โfineโ when we mean โI havenโt felt okay in months.โ
We say โfineโ when weโre falling apart on the inside but still replying to emails.
We say โfineโ because anything more would take too long to explain.
And weโve learned that most people arenโt really listening.
In India, โfineโ is cultural currency.
Youโre expected to be okay.
To smile through the pressure cooker.
To adjust. To sacrifice.
To be grateful for the roof, the job, the family even if none of them see you.
You tell your friend youโre fine.
Because if you tell her the truth, sheโll worry.
You tell your partner youโre fine.
Because if you admit youโre unhappy, youโll have to face what comes next.
You tell yourself youโre fine.
Because saying otherwise feels like failure.
But the cost of โfineโ is heavy.
It leaks into your body.
Your appetite. Your posture. Your sleep.
It makes your smile stiff and your laughter shallow.
It numbs you gently.
And then, completely.
What began as a shortcut becomes a trap.
You say it so often, you forget what you actually feel.
You become a polite ghost in your own life.
Present. Pleasant. But never real.
And hereโs the real tragedy –
People believe you.
They believe the smile. The okay. The fine.
Because they want to.
Because most of us are busy managing our own versions of โfine.โ
So we nod.
We say, โTake care.โ
And we move on.
But sometimes, someone asks again.
โAre you sure?โ
And in that crack, something breaks.
A tear escapes.
A sentence spills.
A truth trembles out –
โIโm not fine.โ
And suddenly, youโre human again.
Thatโs the beginning.
The unraveling of years of holding it together.
The slow return to feeling.
Because life isnโt meant to be fine.
Itโs meant to be felt.
Joy that makes you tear up on a Wednesday.
Grief that leaves you wordless.
Love that scares you.
Fear that humbles you.
Longing that doesnโt go away with distractions.
So next time someone asks –
Be brave.
Be unpolished.
Be messy.
Say, โIโm tired.โ
Say, โIโm trying.โ
Say, โI donโt know.โ
Because the opposite of fine isnโt bad.
Itโs honest.
And honesty is where healing begins.
7๏ธโฃ When Expertise Becomes Your Prison โ Anish Padinjaroote
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐
๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฝ: Why Your Knowledge is Your Prison
I’ve walked into that trap too, few times in my life…..
The transformation from expert to beginner isn’t just professional evolution, it’s personal metamorphosis.
It’s like Harvey Dent’s haunting realization in the Batman movie: “You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” ย In our case, we either question / kill everything we once held sacred or plateau forever as yesterday’s experts.
I’ve experienced that moment when my expertise became my cage, when the very knowledge that elevated me started limiting my vision.
The journey from mastery to metamorphosis demands three core skills I’ve learned through experience and observation:
๐ฆ๐ฒ๐น๐ณ-๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ is the foundation. You must recognize when your expertise has become your blindness. True awareness emerges only when you develop the meta-cognitive ability to examine your own thinking patterns. It’s the difference between knowing your biases exist and actually catching yourself in the act of being biased.
๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป is the discipline. Not all knowledge deserves equal weight. The courage to abandon beliefs that no longer serve, even when they once defined your professional identity; requires ruthless prioritization of what matters now versus what mattered then. ย It’s strategic forgetting in action.
๐ข๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ is the most crucial. ย The ability to hold two opposing ideas simultaneously without cognitive collapse. ย To believe in your methodology while remaining open to its obsolescence.ย It’s the intellectual flexibility that prevents expertise from calcifying into dogma.
Did you know, inside the chrysalis, the caterpillar literally dissolves into cellular soup before reorganizing into something entirely different. This isn’t evolution, it’s complete dissolution followed by reconstruction.
The remarkable part: specialized cell clusters called “imaginal discs” survive the liquefaction. Dormant in the caterpillar all along, these discs contain the butterfly blueprint. When everything familiar dissolves, these hidden structures guide the reformation.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ณ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ฟ๐๐๐ต: Complete transformation requires intentional dissolution.
We approach change as additive; gaining skills, expanding capabilities, growing incrementally. ย But metamorphosis suggests something more radical: our most complete transformations demand that familiar structures break down entirely before new forms can emerge.
The butterfly doesn’t happen despite the dissolution. It happens because of it.
In an AI-accelerated world where instant expertise is commoditized, our edge isn’t what we know, it’s our willingness to unknow. ย To step off that cliff, again and again, trusting that metamorphosis requires the death of who we used to be.
The beginner’s mind isn’t a destination. It’s a practice.
——–
Gaetan Portaels’ take:
Powerful framework, Anish Padinjaroote.
I genuinely believe most “experts” won’t be able to escape this trap.
Primarily, because they’re ADDICTED to “being right” more than “being relevant.” Relevance feels threatening when your whole identity is built on certainty.
Secondarily, because “dissolution” often feels like “professional suicide.” In some ways, you could say your IDENTITY screams as you slaughter your sacred cows.
We’ve all watched truly brilliant minds (and people we admired) become “museums of their former glory.” Not because they werenโt capable, but because they couldnโt stomach the EGO DEATH metamorphosis demands.
In the end, I think the real question is: can you “murder” your expertise whileit’s STILL making you money?
As Bezos puts it better than I could, “Itโs rarely about riding the CURRENT wave. It’s about being early to the next one” โ maybe paraphrasing a little ๐
8๏ธโฃ Emotional Maintenance Guide โ Eric Arzubi
Some struggles are loud.
But most go unnoticed.
You smile through the meetings.
You answer the messages.
You check the boxes.
And still feel off.
Mental health isnโt just about whatโs broken.
Itโs about whatโs missing.
Moments of rest.
Moments of stillness.
Moments where you feel like you again.
This isnโt a fix-it list.
Itโs a gentle return.
To rhythm.
To breath.
To clarity.
Because taking care of your mind isnโt selfish.
Itโs how everything else begins to make sense again.